Study on the relationship between permeability coefficient and liquid bridge force in soil seepage
-
摘要: 为了研究土壤渗流速度的动态变化过程,借助渗透率动态测试装置,监测渗透系数在不同水头作用下的变化趋势。采用计算流体力学与离散单元(CFD-DEM)数值分析方法,结合应用程序接口(API)二次开发功能,实现颗粒之间随着水分增加而产生液桥力的过程,分析颗粒之间的液桥力对渗流速度的影响。结果表明:不同水头下,测试的土壤渗透系数随着时间的延长而降低,相比于颗粒堆积方法分析渗流过程中渗透系数的变化情况,通过API加入液桥力,颗粒的粘结作用增强,渗透系数呈现与实验一致的变化过程,证明液桥力是导致渗流过程中渗透系数突然降低的一个影响因素。Abstract: In order to study the dynamic change process of permeability velocity during soil seepage process, the permeability dynamics test device was used to monitor the change trend of permeability coefficient under different water heads. At the same time, the CFD-DEM numerical simulation analysis method combined with the API secondary development function was used to analyze the liquid bridge force caused by the increase of water content between the particles. The permeability coefficient was decreased with time under different water heads. The soil model of common particle accumulation was difficult to analyze the change of permeability coefficient during the seepage process. After the API application, the particle adhesion under the action of the liquid bridge force was enhanced. And the same change process of permeability coefficient was found by using the API function as in the experiment. Therefore, liquid bridge force was one of influencing factors which caused a sudden decrease in the permeability coefficient during the seepage process.
-
Key words:
- CFD-DEM /
- Soil seepage /
- API /
- Liquid bridge force /
- Bonding
-
表 1 土壤颗粒的相关离散元参数
Table 1. Parameters of discrete element of soil particles
参数
Parameter恢复系数
Recovery factor静摩擦系数
Coefficient of static friction动摩擦系数
Coefficient of dynamic friction密度(kg m−3)
Density剪切模量(Pa)
Shear modulus泊松比
Poisson's ratio红黏土 0.55 0.2 0.1 2600 1e7 0.25 表 2 铁冲流域土壤颗粒筛分结果
Table 2. Soil particle sieving results in the Tiechong River Basin
筛子孔径 (mm)
Size of soil particle质量占比 (%)
Mass content0.5 15 1 65 2 20 -
[1] Megias-alguacil D, Gauckler L J. Analysis of the capillary forces between two small solid spheres binded by a convex liquid bridge[J]. Powder Technology, 2010, 198(2): 211 − 218. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.009 [2] Likos W J, Lu N. Hysteresis of capillary stress in unsaturated granular soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(6): 646 − 655. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(646) [3] 张 昭, 刘奉银, 齐吉琳, 等. 粗颗粒间液桥毛细力演化规律的动态计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(8): 2263 − 2270. [4] 张 昭, 刘奉银, 齐吉琳, 等. 考虑固-液接触角影响的粗颗粒间液桥毛细力计算方法[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(9): 1197 − 1207. [5] 栾茂田, 李顺群, 杨 庆. 非饱和土的理论土-水特征曲线[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, (6): 611 − 615. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.06.001 [6] Jiang M J, Leroueil S, Konrad J M. Insight into shear functions of unsaturated granulates by DEM analyses[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2004, 31(6): 473 − 489. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.07.001 [7] Lechman J, Lu N. Capillary force and water retention between two uneven-sized particles[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 134(5): 374 − 384. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:5(374) [8] Soulié F, Cherblanc F, El Youssoufi M S, et al. Influence of liquid bridges on the mechanical behaviour of polydisperse granular materials[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2006, 30(3): 213 − 228. doi: 10.1002/nag.476 [9] 冀荣华, 刘秋霞, 陈振海, 等. 基于HYDRUS-3D模型的微润灌溉土壤水分入渗模拟[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(增刊): 290 − 295. [10] 南 轩, 刘艳慧, 李 靖, 等. 微颗粒通过透水混凝土运动堵塞规律研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2019, 17(3): 163 − 170. [11] 吕 杰, 陈植华, 龚 星. 测定土壤饱和渗透系数的试验方法与结果优化[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2013, 20(5): 144 − 148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2013.05.031 [12] 王宪良, 胡 红, 王庆杰, 等. 基于离散元的土壤模型参数标定方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(12): 78 − 85. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.12.009 [13] 石林榕, 赵武云, 孙 伟. 基于离散元的西北旱区农田土壤颗粒接触模型和参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(21): 181 − 187. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.21.021 [14] Zhou Y, Shi Z M, Zhang Q M, et al. 3D DEM investigation on the morphology and structure of landslide dams formed by dry granular flows[J]. Engineering Geology, 2019, 258: 105151. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105151 [15] Dollinger J, Lin C H, Udawatta R P, et al. Influence of agroforestry plant species on the infiltration of S-Metolachlor in buffer soils[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2019, 225: 103498 − 103498. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103498 [16] 铁梦雅. 土体渗透变形发展过程及其影响因素的试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院, 2019. [17] Remy B, Khionast J G, Glasser B J. Wet Granular Flows in a Bladed Mixer: Experiments and Simulations of Monodisperse Spheres[J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2012, 58: 3354 − 3369. doi: 10.1002/aic.13743 [18] 刘星志, 吴 悦, 潘诗婷, 等. 颗粒级配对非饱和红土土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2018, (5): 103 − 110. [19] 刘小文, 叶云雪. 不同影响因素下非饱和红土土-水特征曲线的试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2015, 42(2): 97 − 104. [20] 李 幻, 谭 晔, 梁文鹏, 等. 粉土土水特征曲线影响因素试验及模型验证[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(14): 110 − 114.