基于文献计量的农地生态化利用研究现状及热点分析

Current Status and Hotspot Analysis of Ecological Utilization of Agricultural Land Based on Bibliometrics

  • 摘要: 基于文献计量法,利用1992 ~ 2020年CNKI和2002 ~ 2020年WOS共4931条文献,使用CiteSpace软件,先从时间空间分布和发文期刊分布等角度回顾农地生态化利用研究概况,再基于高频关键词和新近突现词总结归纳研究热点和前沿,最后对农地生态化利用进行研究展望。研究发现:(1)时间分布上,国内外发文量整体上均呈波动上升趋势;(2)空间分布上欧洲和美国是该研究领域主要阵地,而中国在国际上亦具有重要地位,中国农业大学等机构走向了国际化;(3)发文期刊上,国内外发文期刊均较为集中,国外偏向环境科学与生态,国内更偏向经济学科;(4)研究热点上,主要有生态化农业经营管理模式、农业从业者农地生态化利用意愿和行为、农地生态化利用制度保障和农地生态化利用评价四大热点;(5)研究前沿上,在农业从业者方面国外关注动机和知识的影响,国内关注社会资本、土地流转和经营规模的影响,在评价性研究上国外关注粮食安全、贫困和生态系统服务,国内关注耕地生态安全和耕地保护分区,制度保障上国内关注生态补偿、轮作休耕和政策工具。

     

    Abstract: Based on the bibliometric method, using CNKI from 1992 to 2020 and WOS from 2002 to 2020, a total of 4931 documents, using CiteSpace software, have been used to review the overview of the ecological utilization of agricultural land from the perspectives of time and space distribution, and highly cited literatures, and then summarized the research hotspots and frontiers based on high-frequency keywords and newly emerging words. The research found that: (1) In terms of time distribution, the volume of domestic and foreign publications had fluctuated and increased as a whole; (2) In terms of spatial distribution, Europe and the United States were the main positions in this research field, and China also had an important position in the world, and institutions such as China Agricultural University; (3) In the published journals, domestic and foreign journals were relatively concentrated, foreign countries preferred environmental science and ecology, and domestic ones preferred economics; (4) In terms of research hotspots, there were mainly four hotspots: ecological agricultural operation and management model, agricultural practitioners’ willingness and behavior of agricultural land ecological utilization, system guarantee for agricultural land ecological utilization, and evaluation of agricultural land ecological utilization; (5) At the research frontier, in terms of agricultural practitioners, foreign countries havd paid attention to the influence of motivation and knowledge, and domestic attention to the influence of social capital, land transfer and land scale. While foreign countries in evaluation research had focused on food security, poverty and ecosystem services, and China had focused on cultivated land ecological security and cultivated land protection zones, and in terms of institutional guarantees, domestic attention was paid to ecological compensation, crop rotation and fallow, and policy tools. Finally, a research outlook on the ecological utilization of agricultural land was carried out.

     

/

返回文章
返回