基于产业发展的新型农业经营主体对设施农用地来源需求及供需匹配

Source and Supply-demand Matching of Facility Farmland of the New Agricultural Management Based on Industrial Development

  • 摘要:
      目的  随着乡村产业转型发展,设施农用地的高效利用有利于满足农业产业多样化的用地需求,探索微观经营主体设施农用地的来源途径,揭示不同类型产业设施农用地的供需状况,以期壮大农业新产业新业态。
      方法  以重庆市涪陵区义和镇为例,基于156户新型农业经营主体的调研数据,采用描述性统计分析、空间缓冲分析法,对产业发展的设施农用地来源、需求意愿及供需匹配问题进行分析研究。
      结果  ①在有/无设施农用地配套情况下义和镇从事果蔬产业的主体均较经营其他类型产业主体数多,且有设施农用地的产业规模较无设施农用地的产业规模大。②新型农业经营主体设施农用地来源具有多样性,其中农户住房及附属地为主要来源,裸地、劣质耕地、荒山、荒草地、闲置居民点次之,最少的为闲置村办公室、废弃学校;同时不同类型经营主体设施农用地来源又具有差异性,如农业企业、农民合作社、家庭农场、专业大户中分别有12.50%、18.74%、45.45%、52.38%主体的设施农用地来源于农户住房及附属地。③有/无设施农用地配套的产业类型中果蔬产业经营主体意在扩大、缩小、不变设施农用地规模的比例均高于其他产业经营主体,且在无设施农用地的产业中除果蔬外,花木、花椒产业经营主体扩大意愿也较强烈,同时不同类型产业中主体意愿扩大的面积比与不同类型产业中意愿扩大的主体数量比不完全一致。④从空间及数量角度看,随着缓冲半径增大各产业中能够实现供大于求的主体数量逐步增加,但不同缓冲范围内潜在设施农用地能够满足不同类型产业需求的主体比例不同,且在1000 m缓冲圆范围内粮油、畜禽水产、花木、花椒产业能完全实现供大于求,果蔬、综合、休闲产业经营主体未能完全实现。
      结论  乡村产业发展应重视设施农用地配套,果蔬、综合、休闲产业设施农用地仍存在供需缺口,未来应引导新型农业经营主体多途径挖掘设施农用地,以满足农业多样化生产需要。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  With the transformation and development of rural industries, the efficient use of facility farmland is conducive to meeting the diversified land use needs of the agricultural industry. The sources of facility farmland for micro-management entities are needed to be analyzed in order to reveal the supply and demand conditions of facility farmland for different new types of agricultural industry format.
      Method  Taking Yihe Town, Fuling District, Chongqing City as an example, based on the survey data of 156 new agricultural business entities, descriptive statistical analysis and spatial buffer analysis methods were used to analyze the source of facility agricultural land, demand willingness and supply-demand matching issues for industrial development research.
      Result  ① With or without facilities agricultural land there were more subjects engaged in fruit and vegetable industry in Yihe Town than other types of industry, and the scale of industry with facilities agricultural land was larger than that of industry without facilities agricultural land. ② The sources of agricultural land for the main facilities of new agricultural operations were diverse, of which farmers’ houses and subsidiary land were the main sources, followed by bare land, low-quality arable land, barren hills, barren grasslands, and idle residential areas, and the least was idle village offices and abandoned schools. At the same time, the different types of main operating facilities from facility agricultural land were also different. For example, 12.50%, 18.74%, 45.45%, and 52.38% of agricultural enterprises, farmer cooperatives, family farms, and large professional households respectively sourced the main facility agricultural land from farmers’ houses and subsidiary land. ③ Among the types of industries with or without facility agricultural land, the proportions of the operating entities for the fruit and vegetable industry in intending to expand, reduce and maintain the scale of facility agricultural land were higher than those of other industrial operators. The willingness of business entities to expand in the flower, tree and pepper industries was also relatively strong. At the same time, the ratio of the area of different types of industries willing to expand was not exactly the same as the ratio of the number of entities willing to expand in different types of industries. ④ From the perspective of space and quantity, as the buffer radius increased, the number of entities that could achieve oversupply gradually increased in each industry. However, the proportions of entities that could meet the needs of different types of industries with potential facility farmland within different buffer ranges were different, and within the 1000 m buffer circle, the grain and oil, livestock, poultry and aquatic products, flowers, trees and pepper industries could fully realize the oversupply. While the business entities of fruit and vegetable, comprehensive and leisure industries could not fully realize the demand.
      Conclusion  The development of rural industries should pay attention to the supporting facilities of agricultural land. There is still a gap between the supply and demand of agricultural land for fruit and vegetable, comprehensive and leisure industries. In the future, new agricultural business entities should be guided to excavate the agricultural land in multiple ways to meet the needs of diversified agricultural production.

     

/

返回文章
返回