赤水河流域不同植被恢复类型土壤有机碳储量特征及其影响因素

Characteristics and Influencing factors of Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Different Vegetation Restoration Types in the Chishui River Basin

  • 摘要:
    目的 研究不同植被恢复类型土壤有机碳和活性组分碳储量及其影响因素,为评价贵州赤水河流域不同恢复策略的生态修复效果提供科学依据和参考。
    方法 以赤水河流域(贵州段)5 种典型植被恢复类型(灌丛、常绿阔叶林、针阔混交林、杉木林和竹林)的土壤为研究对象,分析了土壤总有机碳(SOC)及其活性组分(可溶性有机碳DOC、微生物量碳MBC和易氧化有机碳EOC)的碳储量特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系。
    结果 ① 5种植被类型土壤SOC含量均从表层至深层逐渐递减。竹林土壤SOC平均含量及储量显著高于其它4种植被类型(P < 0.05)。② 5种植被类型土壤DOC、MBC和EOC含量均具有明显的表聚性。在0 ~ 30 cm土层,杉木林土壤DOC含量显著性低于其它植被类型(P < 0.05);竹林和灌丛土壤MBC含量显著高于其它3种植被类型(P < 0.05);土壤EOC含量以竹林最高,灌丛最低。③ 5种植被类型土壤DOC储量为0.24 ~ 0.35 t hm−2,植被类型间差异不显著;土壤MBC储量以灌丛(0.50 t hm−2)显著高于其它植被类型(0.20 ~ 0.40 t hm−2)(P < 0.05);土壤EOC储量以灌丛(5.06 t hm−2)和针阔混交林(6.24 t hm−2)显著低于其它植被类型(10.66 ~ 12.81 t hm−2)(P < 0.05)。④ 由冗余分析可知,土壤容重(BD)对杉木林的SOC及其各组分影响最大,而pH和TP对灌丛MBC的影响程度最高,其余指标(总氮、速效氮、速效磷和含水量)对竹林SOC、EOC和DOC的影响最大。相关性分析表明,土壤有机碳及其组分与总磷、总氮、速效氮、速效磷和含水量均呈不同程度正相关,而与pH 和容重呈负相关(除MBC与pH呈正相关外)。
    结论 5种植被类型中竹林具有较强的SOC固存能力,灌丛有利于提高土壤MBC含量,而灌丛和针阔混交林土壤EOC富集能力较差;植被、土层和土壤理化性质对有机碳空间分布和碳储量均具有显著的影响。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The carbon stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC) and its active components in different vegetation restoration types and their influencing factors were studied, in order to provide scientific basis and reference for evaluating the ecological restoration effects of different restoration strategies in Chishui River Basin, Guizhou Province.
    Method Five typical vegetation restoration types (shrub, evergreen broad-leaved forest, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, Chinese fir forest and bamboo forest) in study area were selected and carbon storage characteristics and influencing factors of soil total SOC and its active components (dissolved organic carbon, DOC; microbial biomass carbon, MBC; easily oxidized organic carbon, EOC) were analyzed.
    Result ① The SOC contents of five vegetation types decreased gradually from surface to deep soil layer. The SOC average content and stock in bamboo plantation were significantly higher than those in the other four types (P < 0.05) in 0 ~ 30 cm soil layer. ② The contents of DOC, MBC and EOC in five vegetation types soils had obvious super aggregation. The average soil DOC content in Chinese fir forest was significantly lower than that in other vegetation types in 0 ~ 30 cm soil layer. The mean contents of soil MBC in bamboo forest and shrub were significantly higher than that in the other three vegetation types (P < 0.05). The mean content of soil EOC was the highest in bamboo forest while the lowest value was in shrub. ③ The soil DOC stocks of the five vegetation types ranged from 0.24 to 0.35 t hm−2, and the difference was no significant (P > 0.05). Soil MBC stock in shrub (0.50 t hm−2) was significantly higher than those of other four vegetation types (0.20 ~ 0.40 t hm−2) (P < 0.05). Soil EOC stocks in shrub (5.06 t hm−2) and coniferous broad-leaved mixed forest (6.24 t hm−2) were significantly lower than those in other vegetation types (10.66 ~ 12.81 t hm−2) (P < 0.05). ④ Redundancy analysis showed that soil bulk density (BD) had the highest influence on Chinese fir forest. Soil pH and total phosphorus (TP) had the greatest influence in the shrub and the other four indices had the greatest influence in bamboo forest. Correlation analysis showed that organic carbon and its components were positively correlated with TP, total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and moisture content, but negatively correlated with soil pH and BD (except for MBC and pH).
    Conclusion In general, the bamboo forest had better SOC retention ability, and the shrub was beneficial to increase soil MBC content, but the shrub and the coniferous broad-leaved mixed forest had poor EOC enrichment ability. Vegetation, soil depth and soil physical and chemical properties have significant effects on the spatial distribution and storage of SOC.

     

/

返回文章
返回