包 昂, 范昊明, 许秀泉, 李 刚, 米彩红, 石 昊. 东北半干旱区不同耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准比较[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 81 − 88. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021013101
引用本文: 包 昂, 范昊明, 许秀泉, 李 刚, 米彩红, 石 昊. 东北半干旱区不同耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准比较[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 81 − 88. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021013101
BAO Ang, FAN Hao-ming, XU Xiu-quan, LI Gang, MI Cai-hong, SHI Hao. Comparison of Erosive Rainfall Standards under Different Tillage Methods in the Semi-arid Region of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 81 − 88. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021013101
Citation: BAO Ang, FAN Hao-ming, XU Xiu-quan, LI Gang, MI Cai-hong, SHI Hao. Comparison of Erosive Rainfall Standards under Different Tillage Methods in the Semi-arid Region of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 81 − 88. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021013101

东北半干旱区不同耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准比较

Comparison of Erosive Rainfall Standards under Different Tillage Methods in the Semi-arid Region of Northeast China

  • 摘要:
      目的  侵蚀性降雨标准是计算土壤流失的关键指标,侵蚀性降雨标准的拟定与耕作方式密切相关,比较同一地区不同耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准差异,对于提高区域土壤侵蚀预报精度具有重要意义。
      方法  根据东北半干旱区径流小区2013 ~ 2019年共7年的降雨径流观测资料,采用频率分析法,拟定几种典型耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨雨量标准,并进行差异性比较。
      结果  结果表明:(1)横垄(9.6 mm)、顺垄(11.65 mm)、地埂植物带(21.15 mm)的7年侵蚀性雨量标准的平均值相比裸地(4.45 mm)分别提高了2.16倍、2.62倍、4.75倍。(2)随着年限的增加,侵蚀性雨量标准的相对误差减小,变差系数减小,合格率升高。选取裸地小区、横垄小区、顺垄小区、地埂植物带小区5年资料序列时的侵蚀性雨量标准的合格率均达到100%。(3)侵蚀性降雨标准越小,径流系数越大,产流次数越多。
      结论  不同耕作方式的对比表明:横垄、顺垄、地埂植物带3种耕作方式能够有效提高侵蚀性降雨标准,其中以地埂植物带最为显著;5年的降雨数据可以满足侵蚀性降雨标准的确定条件;地埂植物带的减沙减流效益最优,其次是横垄,再次是顺垄。研究成果可为东北半干旱区的水土保持综合治理提供一定的参考依据。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  The erosive rainfall standard is a key indicator for calculating soil loss. The formulation of the erosive rainfall standard is closely related to the tillage method. Comparing the difference of the erosive rainfall standards under different tillage methods in the same area is of great significance for improving the accuracy of regional soil erosion forecasting.
      Method  Based on the rainfall-runoff observation data of runoff plots in semi-arid region of Northeast China from 2013 to 2019, the erosive rainfall standards under several typical tillage patterns were formulated by using frequency analysis method.
      Result  (1) compared with bare land plot (4.45 mm), the average value of seven-year erosive rainfall standard of horizontal ridge plot ( 9.6 mm), along ridge plot (11.65 mm) and ridge plant zone plot (21.15 mm) increased by 2.16, 2.62 and 4.75 times, respectively. (2) With the increase of years, the relative error of erosive rainfall standard decreased, the coefficient of variation decreased and the qualified rate increased. The qualified rate of erosive rainfall standard reached 100% when selecting 5-year data series of bare land plot, horizontal ridge plot, along ridge plot and ridge plant zone plot. (3) The larger the runoff coefficient was, the more the runoff production times were, and the smaller the erosive rainfall standard was.
      Conclusion  The comparison of different tillage patterns showed that horizontal ridge plot, along ridge plot and ridge plant zone plot could effectively improve the erosive rainfall standard, of which the ridge plant zone plot is the most significant one. Five-year rainfall data could meet the determination conditions of the erosive rainfall standard. The benefit of sediment and flow reduction is the best in the ridge plant zone plot, followed by the horizontal ridge plot and along ridge plot. The results could provide a certain reference basis for the comprehensive management of soil and water conservation in the semi-arid area of Northeast China.

     

/

返回文章
返回