李 颢, 陈敬龙, 段华泰, 王静波, 李婉秋, 李恋卿, 潘根兴. 工业和农业污染稻田土壤重金属的赋存形态及水稻吸收运移比较[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 204 − 212. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021030905
引用本文: 李 颢, 陈敬龙, 段华泰, 王静波, 李婉秋, 李恋卿, 潘根兴. 工业和农业污染稻田土壤重金属的赋存形态及水稻吸收运移比较[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 204 − 212. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021030905
LI Hao, CHEN Jing-long, DUAN Hua-tai, WANG Jing-bo, LI Wan-qiu, LI Lian-qing, PAN Gen-xing. Comparison of the Forms of Heavy Metals and the Absorption and Transport by Rice between Industrial and Agricultural Contaminated Paddy Soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 204 − 212. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021030905
Citation: LI Hao, CHEN Jing-long, DUAN Hua-tai, WANG Jing-bo, LI Wan-qiu, LI Lian-qing, PAN Gen-xing. Comparison of the Forms of Heavy Metals and the Absorption and Transport by Rice between Industrial and Agricultural Contaminated Paddy Soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 204 − 212. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021030905

工业和农业污染稻田土壤重金属的赋存形态及水稻吸收运移比较

Comparison of the Forms of Heavy Metals and the Absorption and Transport by Rice between Industrial and Agricultural Contaminated Paddy Soils

  • 摘要:
      目的  稻田土壤重金属污染是当前农产品安全生产关注的重要问题。本文比较分析工业和农业污染源稻田土壤重金属的赋存形态及水稻吸收运移,以期为稻田土壤重金属污染控制提供参考。
      方法  在长江中下游地区调查选取工业源和农业源重金属污染稻田各27块,在水稻成熟期使用抖根法采集根际土壤及水稻根系和籽粒样品,采用Tessier七步提取法分析土壤中重金属赋存形态,及土壤-水稻系统重金属迁移富集。
      结果  所分析的Cd、Pb、Cu和Zn土壤全量,工业源稻田均显著高于农业源稻田30%以上,特别是土壤Cd全量达到农用地土壤污染风险管控值的280%以上。土壤中重金属均以残渣态为主(占总量46.84% ~ 64.99%)。Zn、Cd和Cu的交换态占比,工业源土壤高于农业源;相反,腐殖酸结合态占比农业源土壤高于工业源;工业源土壤中Cd、Zn表现出较高的土壤-作物迁移性。工业源水稻籽粒Cd、Cu、Pb含量分别高出农业源76%、172%和298%。冗余分析表明,重金属土壤有效态含量是影响水稻根系重金属累积的主要因子,同时,工业源中水稻根系重金属的累积对土壤pH值响应较强烈,而农业源对土壤有机质的响应更加强烈。
      结论  土壤重金属的赋存形态及水稻的吸收因污染途径的不同存在一定的差异,工业污染稻田中土壤重金属有效性较高,植物迁移与食物污染风险较大。

     

    Abstract:
      objective  Heavy metal pollution of paddy soil is an important issue for the quality and safety of agricultural products. The differences in the forms of heavy metals and their absorption and transport by rice in industrial and agricultural contaminated sources were investigated in order to provide a reference for heavy metal contamination control in paddy soils.
      Method  In the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, 27 rice fields contaminated by heavy metals from industrial sources and agricultural sources were selected. The root shaking method was used to collect rhizosphere soil, rice roots and rice seeds during the rice maturity period.
      Result  The contents of Cd, Pb, Cu and Zn in the soil contaminated by industrial source were more than 30% higher than by the agricultural source rice field. Meanwhile, the total content of soil Cd was more than 280% of soil pollution risk control value of agricultural land. The residual form was the main form of heavy metal, accounting for 46.84% to 64.99%. The exchangeable form of Zn, Cd and Cu from industrial source were higher than those from agricultural source. The proportion of humic acid binding heavy metals in the agricultural soil was higher than that in the industrial soil. Cd and Zn in the industrial source soils showed a high soil-crop mobility. The contents of Cd, Cu, Pb in rice seeds from industrial source was 76%, 172% and 298% higher than those from agricultural source. RDA showed that the main factor for the accumulation of heavy metals in rice roots was its bioavailable form in soil. The accumulation of heavy metals in rice roots from industrial source responded more strongly to pH, while that from agricultural source responded more strongly to soil organic matter.
      Conclusion  Therefore, the forms of heavy metals in soil and the absorption of heavy metals by rice were different due to different pollution routes. In rice fields contaminated by industry, the availability of heavy metals and the risks of plant migration and food contamination were higher.

     

/

返回文章
返回