查理思, 周为吉, 朱孟珏, 张瀚文, 袁定欢. 城中村宅基地低效利用成因研究−以广州X区为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(6): 1281 − 1289. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021031202
引用本文: 查理思, 周为吉, 朱孟珏, 张瀚文, 袁定欢. 城中村宅基地低效利用成因研究−以广州X区为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(6): 1281 − 1289. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021031202
ZHA LI-si, ZHOU Wei-ji, ZHU Meng-jue, ZHANG Han-wen, YUAN Ding-huan. Causes of Low Efficiency of Homestead Utilization and Its Reform Intention in Urban Villages--A Case Study of X District in Guangzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(6): 1281 − 1289. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021031202
Citation: ZHA LI-si, ZHOU Wei-ji, ZHU Meng-jue, ZHANG Han-wen, YUAN Ding-huan. Causes of Low Efficiency of Homestead Utilization and Its Reform Intention in Urban Villages--A Case Study of X District in Guangzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(6): 1281 − 1289. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021031202

城中村宅基地低效利用成因研究以广州X区为例

Causes of Low Efficiency of Homestead Utilization and Its Reform Intention in Urban Villages--A Case Study of X District in Guangzhou

  • 摘要: 城中村的宅基地盘活利用已成为社会热点与共识,本研究选取广州市X区3个宅基地改革试点村作为研究对象,探究宅基地低效利用成因。研究采用地理空间分析和实地调研法,研究发现:(1)低效宅基地面积占比约为12%,主要原因是报建不合要求。一户多宅的村民占比约20%,主要原因为继承或私下购买。(2)X区宅基地管理前期主要问题为管理手段落后于社会发展,后期为管理政策强度高压于社会需求。(3)多数村民认为没有必要分配宅基地给新增本村成员,并且认为资格权以及分配面积落实到个人更为合理。经济发达地区的村民易接受超标宅基地有偿使用制度,经济落后地区的村民更愿意自由交易房屋。多数村民不愿意退出闲置宅基地,但是分到地却没钱建房的愿意置换退出。因此,提高城中村宅基地利用效益,需从微观层面上加强围绕宅基地的人地、供需等关系的疏通,宏观层面上探索围绕城中村可持续发展的社会经济、自然人文环境等制度的构建。

     

    Abstract: Homestead utilization has become a social hot spot and consensus in urban villages. In this study, three pilot villages of homestead reform in X district of Guangzhou were selected, and the causes of inefficient use of homestead were discussed with the methodas of geospatial analysis and field investigation. The results showed that: (1) The low efficient homestead area accounted for about 12%, mainly because the application for rebuild did not meet the requirements. About 20% of the villagers have more than one homestead, mainly because of inheritance or private purchasing. (2) The main problem of homestead management in X District in the early stage was that homestead management lagged behind social development, and the intensity of homestead management policy in the later stage was under high pressure on social demand. (3) Most villagers thought that it was not necessary to allocate homestead to new members of the village and that it was more reasonable to refine the qualification right and the allotted area to individuals. Villagers in economically developed areas were more likely to accept the paid use mechanism of excessive homesteads, while villagers in economically backward areas were more willing to freely trade the houses on their homestead. Most villagers were not willing to quit the idle house sites. Some villagers, who had house sites but had no money to build houses, were willing to displace. To improve the utilization efficiency of urban village homestead, it is necessary to strengthen the relationship between people and land, supply and demand of homestead at the micro-level, and to explore the construction of social and economic, natural and cultural environment around the sustainable development of urban village at the macro-level.

     

/

返回文章
返回