刘冬冬, 李素霞, 刘海霞. 酸性农田土壤镉污染修复钝化材料筛选研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 213 − 220. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021032203
引用本文: 刘冬冬, 李素霞, 刘海霞. 酸性农田土壤镉污染修复钝化材料筛选研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 213 − 220. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021032203
LIU Dong-dong, LI Su-xia, LIU Hai-xia. Screening of Passivating Materials for Remediation of Cadmium Pollution in Acid Farmland Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 213 − 220. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021032203
Citation: LIU Dong-dong, LI Su-xia, LIU Hai-xia. Screening of Passivating Materials for Remediation of Cadmium Pollution in Acid Farmland Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 213 − 220. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021032203

酸性农田土壤镉污染修复钝化材料筛选研究

Screening of Passivating Materials for Remediation of Cadmium Pollution in Acid Farmland Soil

  • 摘要:
      目的  研究0.3 mg kg−1、1.0 mg kg−1、1.5 mg kg−1三种不同镉污染水平的酸性农田土壤单一或复配添加海泡石(H)、膨润土(P)、钙镁磷肥(G)、磷矿粉(L)四种钝化剂钝化镉污染的效果。
      方法  采用室内培养模拟实验,添加单一纯化剂处理于开始培养后10 d、20 d、30 d,复配添加钝化剂处理于开始培养后30 d,取样测定土壤pH、有效态镉含量评价添加钝化剂对土壤镉钝化效果。
      结果  三种镉污染土壤pH值添加H和G钝化剂后升高(P < 0.05)而添加P和L钝化剂变化不明显;与CK相比,0.3 mg kg−1镉含量土壤单一添加4种钝化剂后有效镉含量降低但差异不显著(P > 0.05);1.0 mg kg−1镉含量土壤,单一添加H、G钝化剂有效镉含量明显下降而单一添加P、L钝化剂有效镉含量变化不显著(P > 0.05);复配添加2% H、1% G钝化剂,土壤有效态镉降低52.73%,效果最好;1.5 mg kg−1镉污染土壤,单一添加H、G钝化剂有效镉含量显著下降,单一添加P、L钝化剂的有效镉含量下降不显著(P > 0.05),而复配添加1.5% H和1% G钝化剂处理土壤有效态镉降低了56.45%,效果良好。
      结论  建议对0.3 mg kg−1镉含量土壤不进行钝化修复,对1.0 mg kg−1和1.5 mg kg−1镉含量土壤分别推荐使用复配添加2% H、1% G和1.5% H、1% G钝化剂进行修复。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  The effects of sepiolite (H), bentonite (P), calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer (G) and phosphate rock powder (L) on cadmium (Cd) pollution in acidic farmland soils with 0.3 mg kg−1, 1.0 mg kg−1 and 1.5 mg kg−1 Cd levels were studied .
      Methods  The experiment was simulated by indoor culture.Samples were taken at 10 d, 20 d and 30 d after culture with the single purified agent, and samples were taken at 30 d after culture with the compound passivating agent. Then, soil pH and available cadmium content were measured to evaluate the effect of passivating agent.
      Result  The pH values in the three Cd contaminated soils increased with H and G passivators (P < 0.05), while the pH values did not change significantly with P and L passivators. Compared with CK, the effective Cd content in 0.3 mg kg−1 Cd contaminated soil with four passivators was decreased, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). In soil with 1.0 mg kg−1 Cd addition, the effective Cd contents of H and G passivating agents decreased significantly, but the effective Cd contents of P and L passivating agents did not change significantly (P > 0.05). In addition, 2%H + 1%G passivators reduced soil available Cd by 52.73%, with the best effect. In 1.5 mg kg−1 Cd contaminated soil, the effective Cd contents were significantly decreased by H and G passivator alone, while the effective Cd contents were not significantly decreased by P and L passivator alone (P > 0.05). However, the effective Cd content in soil treated by 1.5% H + 1% G passivators combined was reduced by 56.45%, showing a good effect.
      Conclusion  it is recommended that the 2% H + 1% G and 1.5 H + 1% G passivating agents were used to passivate 1.0 mg kg−1 and 1.5 mg kg−1 Cd contaminated soils.

     

/

返回文章
返回