留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于Web of Science数据库的污染场地可持续修复领域的文献计量分析

杨宗帅 魏昌龙 宋昕 万金忠 李燕丽 唐志文

杨宗帅, 魏昌龙, 宋 昕, 万金忠, 李燕丽, 唐志文. 基于Web of Science数据库的污染场地可持续修复领域的文献计量分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 221 − 233 doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021051201
引用本文: 杨宗帅, 魏昌龙, 宋 昕, 万金忠, 李燕丽, 唐志文. 基于Web of Science数据库的污染场地可持续修复领域的文献计量分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 221 − 233 doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021051201
YANG Zong-shuai, WEI Chang-long, SONG Xin, WAN Jin-zhong, LI Yan-li, TANG Zhi-wen. Research on Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Sites -- Metrological Analysis Based on Web of Science Database[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 221 − 233 doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021051201
Citation: YANG Zong-shuai, WEI Chang-long, SONG Xin, WAN Jin-zhong, LI Yan-li, TANG Zhi-wen. Research on Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Sites -- Metrological Analysis Based on Web of Science Database[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(1): 221 − 233 doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021051201

基于Web of Science数据库的污染场地可持续修复领域的文献计量分析

doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021051201
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1805700)和江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2019624)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨宗帅(1998−),男,河南禹州人,硕士研究生。主要从事污染场地可持续修复研究。E-mail: zsyang@issas.ac.cn

    通讯作者:

    E-mail: clwei@issas.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: X53

Research on Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Sites -- Metrological Analysis Based on Web of Science Database

  • 摘要: 实现碳达峰、碳中和目标是我国经济社会深刻的系统性变革,“双碳”目标的提出将对我国土壤污染修复领域产生重要影响,并促进研发更多符合绿色可持续修复的新技术和新产品。为了解污染场地可持续修复领域的研究进展和发展动态,采用CiteSpace和VOSviewer科学图谱绘制软件对Web of Science数据库核心集中2000 ~ 2020年污染场地可持续修复领域的相关文献进行了计量分析,通过合作、共现和共被引等网络分析,探索该领域的研究热点和前沿趋势。结果表明:1)近年来世界范围内该领域发文数量总体呈增长趋势;2)该领域发文量前三的国家是美国、英国和中国;3)该领域的主要发文机构有清华大学、剑桥大学和中国科学院;4)Hou、Norrman和Rosen是该领域发文数量较多的研究人员;5)载文量较多的期刊有Science of the Total Environment、Journal of Environmental Management和Journal of Cleaner Production;6)目前污染场地多采用异位修复的方式修复,原位修复技术及各类耦合修复技术的研究将会增多;7)对土壤修复的可持续研究逐渐增多,地下水修复的可持续研究较少。制定科学合理的具有中国特色的污染场地可持续修复方法势在必行;降低污染修复全过程的环境影响和二次污染是响应碳减排号召的重要过程,环境友好型材料研发、绿色可持续修复技术的实施是污染场地可持续修复领域的重要措施。
  • 图  1  2000 ~ 2020年污染场地可持续修复研究领域文献发表量

    Figure  1.  Number of papers during 2000 ~ 2020 in the field of sustainable remediation of contaminated sites

    图  2  2000 ~ 2020年污染场地可持续修复领域重要论文产出国及相互合作关系图谱(a) 各国家/地区合作关系 (b) 中国与其他国家/地区合作关系

    圆圈大小表示国家发文数量;连线宽度代表合作关系。

    Figure  2.  Collaborative relationships between paper contributing countries in the field of sustainable remediation of contaminated sites from 2000 ~ 2020 (a) Cooperation among countries /regions (b) China cooperation with other countries/regions

    图  3  2000 ~ 2020年污染场地可持续修复研究热点分布

    节点代表关键词;节点大小代表关键词出现的次数;不同颜色代表不同聚类。

    Figure  3.  Distribution of hot spots in the field of sustainable remediation of contaminated sites from 2000 to 2020

    图  4  作者间合作关系图

    Figure  4.  Cooperation between authors

    图  5  文献共被引聚类图

    Figure  5.  View of clusters of co-cited literatures

    表  1  污染场地可持续修复领域发文量排名前十位的国家/地区

    Table  1.   Top 10 Countries/regions in number of publications on sustainable remediation of contaminated sites

    排名
    Rank
    国家
    Country
    发表文献量
    Number of papers
    总联系强度
    Total link strength
    排名
    Rank
    国家
    Country
    发表文献量
    Number of papers
    总联系强度
    Total link strength
    1 美国 64 50 6 澳大利亚 16 26
    2 英国 51 69 7 加拿大 15 19
    3 中国 49 49 8 瑞典 12 10
    4 德国 24 47 9 比利时 11 23
    5 意大利 23 32 10 荷兰 11 30
      注:总联系强度代表每个国家与其他国家的合作共现次数。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  总发文量排名前10机构

    Table  2.   Top 10 institutions in total number of papers

    排名
    Rank
    机构
    Institution
    发文数量
    Number of papers
    总联系强度
    Total link strength
    排名
    Rank
    机构
    Institution
    发文数量
    Number of papers
    总联系强度
    Total link strength
    1 清华大学 17 23 6 克兰菲尔德大学 6 8
    2 中国科学院 11 17 7 诺丁汉大学 5 13
    3 布莱顿大学 9 24 8 中国环境科学研究院 5 8
    4 查尔姆斯理工大学 8 11 9 威尼斯大学 4 10
    5 阿尔伯塔大学 6 11 10 奥地利环境局 3 9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  污染场地可持续修复领域关键词突现时间及强度分析

    Table  3.   Keywords strongest in citation burst in the recent 20 years in the field of sustainable remediation of contaminated sites

    关键词
    Keyword
    突现强度
    Strength
    起始时间
    Begin
    结束时间
    End
    关键词
    Keyword
    突现强度Strength起始时间
    Begin
    结束时间
    End
    Cadmium 1.98 2004 2012 Bioremediation 2.01 2015 2016
    Environment 2.27 2008 2012 Multicriteria decision analysis 1.95 2016 2017
    Biodegradation 2.54 2010 2013 Sustainability assessment 1.92 2016 2018
    Management 2.67 2013 2014 Contaminated land remediation 1.68 2016 2018
    Soil 1.73 2013 2017 Life cycle assessment 4.06 2017 2020
    Sustainable remediation 3.47 2014 2016 Pollution 2.39 2017 2018
    Policy 1.71 2014 2017 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon 1.88 2017 2018
    Decision support tool 2.40 2015 2017 Biochar 1.66 2017 2018
    Appraisal 2.24 2015 2017
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  发文量排名前十位学者

    Table  4.   Top 10 authors in number of papers

    排名
    Rank
    作者
    Author
    发文数量
    Number of publications
    总联系强度
    Total link strength
    排名
    Rank
    作者
    Author
    发文数量
    Number of ublications
    总联系强度
    Total link strength
    1 Hou DY 17 34 6 Shen ZT 7 18
    2 Norrman J 8 34 7 Critto A 6 27
    3 Rosen L 8 30 8 Soderqvist T 6 23
    4 O’connor D 8 17 9 Burger J 6 7
    5 Pizzol L 7 30 10 Volchko Y 5 22
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  载文量及相关类别前10期刊

    Table  5.   Top 10 Journals and categories in number of papers

    排名
    Rank
    期刊名称
    Journal
    发文数量
    Number of
    Papers
    影响因子
    Impact Factor
    相关类别
    Category
    发文数量
    Number of
    Papers
    1 Science of the Total Environment 34 6.551 Environmental Sciences 178
    2 Journal of Environmental Management 22 5.647 Green Sustainable Science Technology 45
    3 Journal of Cleaner Production 16 7.246 Engineering Environmental 38
    4 Sustainability 13 2.576 Environmental Studies 22
    5 Environmental Science and Pollution Research 9 3.056 Engineering Civil 17
    6 Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 6 1.903 Soil Science 13
    7 Building and Environment 4 4.971 Water Resources 12
    8 Journal of Soils and Sediments 4 2.763 Biotechnology Applied Microbiology 11
    9 Journal of Urban Planning and Development 4 1.381 Ecology 11
    10 Environmental Pollution 3 6.793 Public Environmental Occupational Health 11
      注:各期刊的影响因子为2019年的综合影响因子
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  共被引次数排名前10文献

    Table  6.   Top 10 Co-cited literatures

    排名
    Rank
    题目
    Title
    作者
    Author
    载文期刊
    Journal
    共被引次数
    Co-references Score
    1 Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation Hou DY Environmental Science & Policy 29
    2 SCORE: A novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation Rosen L Science of the Total Environment 17
    3 Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for "gentle" remediation approaches: The European context Cundy A. B Journal of Environmental Management 17
    4 Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options Huysegoms L Journal of Environmental Management 15
    5 Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: A case study at a mega-site in China Song YN Science of the Total Environment 15
    6 Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model Schadler S Journal of Environmental Management 14
    7 Applying sustainable development principles to contaminated land management using the SuRF-UK framework Bardos P Remediation 13
    8 Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land Soderqvist T Journal of Environmental Management 13
    9 Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation Rizzo E Journal of Environmental Management 12
    10 Using a hybrid LCA method to evaluate the sustainability of sediment remediation at the London Olympic Park Hou DY Journal of Cleaner Production 11
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  被引频次排名前5文献

    Table  7.   Top 5 literatures in total global citation score

    排名
    Rank
    题目
    Title
    第一作者
    First Author
    被引次数
    Citation Score
    1 Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: outcomes, assessment and outlook from COST Action 859 Mench M 216
    2 Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in China: A review Teng YG 159
    3 Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation Hou DY 127
    4 The challenge of sustainability: incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe Thornton G 114
    5 Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments:
    A focus on sustainability and green building
    Wedding GC 113
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 黄 飞, 高帅鹏, 花建丽. 中国污染场地修复工程二次污染防治措施研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2020, 45(7): 133 − 137.
    [2] 马新月. 重庆市工业场地污染特性及污染场地可持续修复模式研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.
    [3] 李青青, 罗启仕, 郑 伟, 等. 土壤修复技术的可持续性评价−以原位稳定/固化技术和异位填埋技术为例[J]. 土壤, 2009, 41(2): 308 − 314. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2009.02.028
    [4] 张红振, 於 方, 曹 东, 等. 发达国家污染场地修复技术评估实践及其对中国的启示[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2012, 34(2): 105 − 111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3865.2012.02.023
    [5] 董璟琦. 污染场地绿色可持续修复评估方法及案例研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2019.
    [6] 侯德义, 李广贺. 污染土壤绿色可持续修复的内涵与发展方向分析[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(20): 16 − 19.
    [7] Li X N, Cundy A B, Chen W P, et al. Systematic and bibliographic review of sustainability indicators for contaminated site remediation: Comparison between China and western nations[J]. Environmental research, 2015, (1): 111490.
    [8] Ellis D E. Sustainable remediation white paper—Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects[J]. Remediation Journal, 2010, 19: 393 − 397.
    [9] Hou D Y, Al-Tabbaa A. Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2014, 39: 25 − 34. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.003
    [10] 宋 昕, 林 娜, 殷鹏华. 中国污染场地修复现状及产业前景分析[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 1 − 7.
    [11] 张红振, 董璟琦, 何 军, 等. 推动污染场地修复行业可持续发展[N]. 中国环境报. 中国环境报: 3.
    [12] 戴晓虎, 张 辰, 章林伟, 等. 碳中和背景下污泥处理处置与资源化发展方向思考[J]. 给水排水, 2021, 57(3): 1 − 5.
    [13] 侯 丽, 高 阳, 刘路路. 我国农田重金属污染生态补偿研究现状与展望−基于citespace知识图谱分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(8): 132 − 143. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.08.13
    [14] 吴永红, 靳少非. 基于citespace的重金属污染土壤修复研究文献计量分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(3): 454 − 461. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2019-0943
    [15] 黄现民, 樊 平, 闵建美, 等. 国际土壤农药污染研究进展与前沿——基于CiteSpace分析[J]. 土壤, 2021-05-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1118.p.20200909.1756.002.html.
    [16] 吴名杰, 王 贺, 伍一宁, 等. 基于文献计量的土壤环境中多环芳烃降解的研究现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(5): 60 − 67. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18100049
    [17] 张维荣, 严 康, 汪海珍, 等. 基于1983—2019年文献计量对多环芳烃降解基因研究及进展的剖析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(3): 1138 − 1148.
    [18] 陈 悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. Citespace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242 − 253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009
    [19] Eck N J, Waltman L. Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 523 − 538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
    [20] 马 妍, 王 盾, 徐 竹, 等. 北京市工业污染场地修复现状、问题及对策[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(10): 120 − 124.
    [21] 王永林, 张传合, 赵宇鹏, 等. 基于Web of Science 数据库的土壤生物修复研究趋势分析[J]. 环境工程, 2021-05-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2097.X.20201124.1703.004.html.
    [22] Ghosal D, Ghosh S, Dutta T K, et al. Current state of knowledge in microbial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2016, 7: 1369 − 1380.
    [23] Gerhardt K E, Huang X D, Glick B R, et al. Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: Potential and challenges[J]. Plant Science, 2008, 176(1): 20 − 30.
    [24] Shi J X, Zhang B J, Cheng Y T, et al. Microbial vanadate reduction coupled to co-metabolic phenanthrene biodegradation in groundwater[J]. Water Research, 2020, 186(116354).
    [25] 骆永明, 滕 应. 中国土壤污染与修复科技研究进展和展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(5): 1137 − 1142.
    [26] Kleinberg J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2003, 7(4): 373 − 397. doi: 10.1023/A:1024940629314
    [27] Cundy A B, Bardos R P, Church A, et al. Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: The european context[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 129: 283 − 291.
    [28] Reinikainen J, Sorvari J, Tikkanen S. Finnish policy approach and measures for the promotion of sustainability in contaminated land management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 184(SI): 108 − 119.
    [29] Hou D Y, Ding Z, Li G H, et al. A sustainability assessment framework for agricultural land remediation in china[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29(4): 1005 − 1018.
    [30] Huysegoms L, Cappuyns V. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 196: 278 − 296.
    [31] Rosen L, Back P E, Soderqvist T, et al. Score: A novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 511: 621 − 638. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.058
    [32] Bardos P, Bone B, Boyle R, et al. Applying sustainable development principles to contaminated land management using the surf-uk framework[J]. Remediation Journal, 2015, 21(2): 77 − 100.
    [33] Rizzo E, Bardos P, Pizzol L, et al. Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 184: 4 − 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.062
    [34] Schadler S, Morio M, Bartke S, et al. Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(3): 827 − 837. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.026
    [35] Soderqvist T, Brinkhoff P, Norberg T, et al. Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 157: 267 − 278.
    [36] Hou D Y, Al-Tabbaa A, Guthrie P, et al. Using a hybrid lca method to evaluate the sustainability of sediment remediation at the london olympic park[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 83: 87 − 95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.062
    [37] Song Y N, Hou D Y, Zhang J L, et al. Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: A case study at a mega-site in china[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 610: 391 − 401.
    [38] Mench M, Lepp N, Bert V, et al. Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: Outcomes, assessment and outlook from cost action 859[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10(6): 1039 − 1070. doi: 10.1007/s11368-010-0190-x
    [39] Teng Y G, Wu J, Lu S J, et al. Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in china: A review[J]. Environment International, 2014, 69: 177 − 199. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.014
    [40] Thornton G, Franz M, Edwards D, et al. The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in europe[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2006, 10(2): 116 − 134.
    [41] Wedding G C, Crawford-Brown D. Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2007, 85(2): 483 − 495. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.018
    [42] Obiri-Nyarko F, Grajales-Mesa S J, Malina G. An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation[J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 111: 243 − 259. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.112
    [43] Varma R S. Journey on greener pathways: From the use of alternate energy inputs and benign reaction media to sustainable applications of nano-catalysts in synthesis and environmental remediation[J]. Green Chemistry, 2014, 16(4): 2027 − 2041. doi: 10.1039/c3gc42640h
    [44] Wang H M, Luo H P, Fallgren P H, et al. Bioelectrochemical system platform for sustainable environmental remediation and energy generation[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2015, 33(3-4): 317 − 334. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.04.003
    [45] Wuana R A, Okieimen F E. Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation[J]. ISRN Ecology, 2011, 2011: 1 − 20.
    [46] 梁 竞, 王世杰, 张文毓, 等. 美国污染场地修复技术对我国修复行业发展的启示[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(06): 173 − 178.
    [47] Luo Y M. Current research and development in soil remediation technologies[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2-3): 558 − 565.
    [48] 高连东, 吴丛, 杨慧. 重金属污染土壤修复技术及其研究进展[J]. 环境与发展, 2020, 32(12): 38 − 39.
    [49] 韩 伟, 叶 渊, 焦文涛, 等. 污染场地修复中原位热脱附技术与其他相关技术耦合联用的意义、效果及展望[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(10): 2302 − 2310. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201906019
    [50] Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, et al. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60(3): 498 − 508.
    [51] 张红振, 董璟琦, 司绍诚, 等. 中国环境修复产业发展现状与预测分析[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(17): 50 − 53.
    [52] 谷庆宝, 侯德义, 伍 斌, 等. 污染场地绿色可持续修复理念、工程实践及对我国的启示[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(8): 4061 − 4068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150876
    [53] 刘 锴, 宋易南, 侯德义. 污染地块修复的社会可持续性与公众知情研究[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(9): 37 − 42.
    [54] 王金淑, 潘 波, 周 莹, 等. “材料与可持续发展−环境友好材料与环境修复材料”(2020年)专栏序言[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(3): 5 − 6.
    [55] 可 欣, 周 燕, 张飞杰, 等. 污染场地修复药剂安全利用问题及对策[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021-05-12. https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.12.02.
    [56] 夏志先, 赵九娟, 张金山, 等. 土壤重金属污染现状、危害以及化学修复稳定药剂研究进展[J]. 上海化工, 2017, 42(10): 24 − 29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-017X.2017.10.015
    [57] Sheau-Y D C, Gu Q B. Brownfield sites remediation technology overview, trends, and opportunities in china[J]. Remediation Journal. 2015, 25(3): 85-99.
    [58] 骆永明. 中国污染场地修复的研究进展、问题与展望[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2011, 23(3): 1 − 6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2009.2011.03.002
    [59] 王艳伟, 李书鹏, 康绍果, 等. 中国工业污染场地修复发展状况分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(10): 175 − 178.
    [60] 杨 宾, 李慧颖, 伍 斌, 等. 污染场地中挥发性有机污染工程修复技术及应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013, 3(1): 78 − 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2013.01.014
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  313
  • HTML全文浏览量:  89
  • PDF下载量:  89
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-05-12
  • 修回日期:  2021-10-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-02-12
  • 刊出日期:  2022-02-06

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回