杨肖丽, 马豪壹, 张瑞龙. 农户土壤质量认知与施肥行为研究−以辽宁省北镇市葡萄种植户为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(2): 290 − 300. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021070602
引用本文: 杨肖丽, 马豪壹, 张瑞龙. 农户土壤质量认知与施肥行为研究−以辽宁省北镇市葡萄种植户为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(2): 290 − 300. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021070602
YANG Xiao-li, MA Hao-yi, ZHANG Rui-long. Soil Quality Cognition and Fertilization Behavior of Farmers—Based on the Survey of Grape Planters in Beizhen, Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(2): 290 − 300. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021070602
Citation: YANG Xiao-li, MA Hao-yi, ZHANG Rui-long. Soil Quality Cognition and Fertilization Behavior of Farmers—Based on the Survey of Grape Planters in Beizhen, Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(2): 290 − 300. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021070602

农户土壤质量认知与施肥行为研究以辽宁省北镇市葡萄种植户为例

Soil Quality Cognition and Fertilization Behavior of Farmers—Based on the Survey of Grape Planters in Beizhen, Liaoning Province

  • 摘要:
      目的  农户保护黑土地的行为在于客观评价土壤质量和合理适用化肥等投入品。两者关系是“知而行之”还是“行而知之”,尚无定论。
      方法  依据辽宁省北镇市944户葡萄种植户入户调查数据,构建农户施肥行为与土壤质量认知理论模型,实证检验两者关系;并运用联立方程模型验证农户土壤质量认知形成机制。
      结果  农户存在土壤质量认知反常现象,即施肥行为显著正向影响土壤质量认知水平,而非土壤质量认知决定施肥行为;进一步分析发现,当农户人力资本、社会资本水平较高,这种认知与行为的反常现象消失,说明较高人力资本、社会资本水平有助于修正农户对土壤质量认知偏差程度;另外,邻里效应在农户施肥决策过程中起到重要作用。
      结论  应深入开展农业培训活动,重点提升农户知识素养,树立“榜样”力量,促使农户正确认知土壤质量,进而采取合理化施肥行为。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  Farmers’ behaviors of protecting black soil depend on the objective evaluation of soil quality and the correct usage of chemical fertilizer and other inputs. There is no final conclusion whether the relationship between them is “knowing then doing” or “doing then knowing”.
      Method  Therefore, based on the household survey data of 944 grape growers in Beizhen City, Liaoning Province, a theoretical model of farmers’ fertilization behavior and soil quality was constructed to empirically test the relationship between them. The simultaneous equation model was used to verify the formation mechanism of farmers’ soil quality cognition.
      Result  The results showed that farmers have abnormal cognition of soil quality, that is, fertilization behavior significantly and positively affected the cognitive level of soil quality, rather than soil quality cognition determined fertilization behavior. Further analysis showed that when the level of human capital and social capital of farmers was high, this abnormal phenomenon of cognition and behavior disappeared, indicating that the higher level of human capital and social capital is helpful to correct the cognitive deviation of farmers on soil quality. In addition, neighborhood effect played an important role in farmers’ fertilization decision-making process.
      Conclusion  Therefore, agricultural training activities should be carried out in depth, focusing on improving farmers’ knowledge literacy, setting an “example” force, promoting farmers to correctly understand soil quality, and then farmers take rational fertilization behavior.

     

/

返回文章
返回